imagen-3.0-generate-002

text imagetext 0K context

$0.04 per image
2 providers

What we tested, and what came back

Each capability below is a fixed experiment: the same prompt and the same input images for every model we test. That's what makes these outputs comparable — and it's why the same bicycle shows up on every image model's page.

Stated by the provider — not tested by us
✗ also understands images✗ multi turn editing✗ negative prompts✗ outpainting
Attempted but blocked

We ran these and the provider refused the request — that means we don’t know, not that the model can’t do it.

? Renders a data-faithful infographic? Replaces a target object in place (prompt-based inpainting)
Specs
aspect ratios
1:1, 3:4, 4:3, 9:16, 16:9
max resolution
1024x1024 (1:1); 768x1408 (9:16), 1408x768 (16:9), 896x1280 (3:4), 1280x896 (4:3)
n images per request
4
watermark
SynthID, enabled by default (Vertex addWatermark default true)
price per image
0.04
speed tier
fast
latency t2i s
0.4
latency i2i s
0.3
availability note
probe access_limited: HTTP 404: { "error": { "code": 404, "message": "models/imagen-3.0-generate-002 is not found for API version v1

Sources: docs.cloud.google.com · web.archive.org · docs.cloud.google.com · cloud.google.com

Where to run it

The same model, priced by each provider that serves it. Cheapest first — the card's headline price is the best available anywhere, which is the wrong number for choosing where to actually send your traffic.

ProviderPriceContext
vertexai Not published480Get a key ↗ partner

Rows marked partner may earn us a commission. Ordering is by price only — it is never influenced by what a provider pays us.

See all google models we've tested →

How we test

Every claim is tagged by how we know it. Tested means we ran the model against a fixed prompt and checked the output — the images above are those runs. Researched means it's documented by the provider and cited. Nothing here is inferred.